Weekly WIN: harbinger


One Step Now Education

October 10, 2025

harbinger

The leaves turn shades of brown, yellow, orange, and red, a harbinger of the fall.

Autumn is my favorite season, and October is my favorite month. However, autumn leads into winter, my least favorite. Winter never used to bother me at all with its inches of snow and zero temperatures. As I grow older, I become less enamored. I turned to a book by Kari Leibowitz, How To Winter, to help me transition into this dark and frigid time.

In her book, I encountered the word harbinger. Surely this didn't have an <-ing> suffix! But could that be an <-er> suffix? If so, what type of <-er> suffix could it be? Let's explore this word's meaning, structure, relatives, and graphemes.

In our exploration, we'll learn more about the functions of nouns. We'll look at the types of appositives. Be ready for the possibility of an agent noun suffix. After we use the follow the "froms" technique for exploring an Etymonline entry, we'll dive a little into the history of English, including the link between French and the Germanic peoples and languages.


Meaning

What is this word's meaning and how does the word function?

A harbinger is a sign that something else is going to happen. The example sentence from the entry in the Collins dictionary even refers to winter:

The November air stung my cheeks, a harbinger of winter.

From the dictionary entry, we also learn that harbinger is a countable noun. As a word class, nouns can be made plural. We can have multiple harbingers of winter: the stinging wind, the cooling temperatures, a snowflake or two. Even the Christmas displays can be a harbinger. Although, they seem to be going up so early now that you might actually consider them a harbinger of Halloween.

In our sentence above, the noun harbinger functions as an appositive noun. An appositive is a noun phrase which modifies or explains another noun phrase. Here, harbinger, is renaming the air from earlier in the sentence. An appositive may or may not be set apart by commas. If the meaning of the sentence would be changed if the appositive were removed, it is called a restrictive appositive.

My son Trey doesn't like tomatoes.

In this sentence, the noun Trey is an appositive renaming my son. The name is critical in order to identify which of my three sons I'm referring to. If I say, “My son doesn’t like tomatoes,” you can’t be sure which of my three sons I’m referring to.

Restrictive appositives are not set aside with commas.

Trey, my youngest son, doesn't like tomatoes.

Here, "my youngest son" is a non-restrictive appositive. You can remove this noun phrase and the sentence would still convey its basic meaning. We usually set non-restrictive appositives within commas.

Structure

What are the elements that make up this word's structure?

In my work with younger students, we sometimes play a game called Suffix or Not? in order to help them begin identifying these elements that occur after a base in a word. Several students might say the water is a suffix or the string is a suffix.

The easiest way to determine if something is a suffix or not is to remove the suffix and see if what you have left is a word. This works well on words like playing or camper. However, what about our suffixes above? Well, that usually requires going through the Four Question Framework like we are doing now to see how the word is built.

Harb + ing + er?

I've never been harbing or had a harb, but that doesn't mean that couldn't be the base of our word. After all, I've never been rupting or had a vade, but interrupting and invader are both words. Perhaps bound base, like

Let's take a look at the entry in Etymonline.

When it entered our lexicon in the late 15th century, English speakers spelled this word herbengar. Then, a harbinger was "a person sent ahead to arrange lodging." Let's trace the word back in time by following the "froms" in the entry.

Middle English herberger
OF herbergeor
OF herbergier
OF herber
Frankish *heriberga
Germanic *harja-bergaz

First let's note the asterisk in those two entries. The asterisk is a linguistic symbol that means these words are unattested in written form. They are often recreated through methods linguists use to piece together how an earlier form may have been pronounced. Since they are unattested, we will not refer to them to determine the orthographic journey of our word.

We can note that these words we got from French did not come from Latin, although French is a daughter language of Latin. The Franks were a Germanic people who invaded the Roman Empire in the 5th century. We see the Frankish term coming from a Germanic compound. Although modern German descends from one branch of the Germanic language family, this language family also includes Dutch, Swedish, Afrikaans, and English. The Germanic people were a group of tribes that lived in Northern Europe that may have actually shared little identity other than that they spoke what are now considered Germanic languages.

The biggest thing to notice in its orthographic journey is the insertion of the grapheme passenger or messenger. Certainly, if we are following the typical pattern of adding the agent suffix <-er>, we would have *messager or *passager.

The grapheme

The intrusive herbergier is an "agent noun." The suffix <-er> is an agent noun suffix in English, forming people (teacher) or things (expander) that "do" the verb that is the stem or base. We see that same French agent noun suffix <-ier> in the English cashier.

I would offer that it's not terribly productive to analyze this far. After all, here's what we are left with:

harbing + er

In the Oxford English Dictionary, I do see an entry harbinge, which is the verb form of this word.

harbinge/ + er

That single final non-syllabic

The Oxford says this word is obsolete. The last use is listed in the 1800s. Although it provides interesting discussion, I would probably leave this word intact for a student rather than analyze it into a word sum.

Relatives

What are the word's relatives and history?

In the Etymonline entry, they suggest the Germanic compound could also be the source of harbor. If that is the case, we could include harbor in an etymological family with this word. However, since they do not share a base, they would not occur in the same matrix, which is built from words that share the same base and root.

The entry for harbor tells us the first element in the Germanic compound referred to an "army" and may be related to the verb harry, "lay waste." This word comes from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, one of the few written records we rely on for orthographic evidence of Old English. They used the term to refer to what the Vikings were doing to England. The name Harry is familiar for Henry and unrelated.

The second element in our Germanic compound is from a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root meaning "hide; protect." It is also the source of bargain, borrow, and bury. In some sense, these words could be considered part of the etymological family as well.

Graphemes

What can the pronunciation of the word teach us about the relationship of its graphemes and its phonology?

Perhaps the most interesting thing to say about the grapheme-phoneme correspondences in this word is the [dʒ] pronunciation the


Next Steps

What concepts from this investigation can we explore next to learn more about the English orthographic system?

Have you and your students studied appositives?

What role does French play in the history of English? How does its unique role bridge Latin and English? What phonological changes do you note? What words have we adopted from both Latin and French? (These words, like frail and fragile are known as doublets).

What other suffixes besides <-er> form agent nouns? Or maybe what did I mean by "what type of <-er> suffix" in the intro?


Did that unetymological harbinger of a suffix? I'm interested in the biggest aha from this investigation. Hit reply and tell me. I enjoy hearing what makes people stop and think from these investigations.

Stay curious,

Brad

Check out the website!

Join the community!

P.S. If you're teaching agent noun suffixes, you might consider a word sort to explore any patterns for when to use which agent noun suffix.

P.P.S. The

P.P.P.S. Share this with a colleague who wants to know more about appositives or has students who confuse subscribe here.

One Step Now Education

113 Cherry St #92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2205
Unsubscribe · Preferences

background

Subscribe to Discover how spelling works in only five minutes a week.